comments on the editorial comments for this thursday's call

[christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>]

Lines 40-41, need the word "normative" or "non-normative" somewhere.

<CBF> I believe that this is minor technical. I have a similar comment outstanding that also
addresses this issue. The transport bindings should,
IMHO, be normative and should be in the body of the document, not treated as an appendix.</CBF>

Lines 82-92. How do these compare with the documents mentioned in lines
110-116?

I agree with the comment, but would propose that it be addressed
by including the RegRep and TP document (referenced in 110/116) in the
list of related documents.

Line 84. Change "of the" to "on these"?

<CBF>I would prefer the following:
defines the requirements for the ebXML Message Service
</CBF>

Lines 121-123. Reword to indicate this is one possible architecture, not
a required architecture.  Consider separating the "applications" and
"interface" boxes, as is done with the transport box -- that would help
emphasize what this particular document is defining.

<CBF>
It would help to have a specific proposed wording for this
paragraph.
</CBF>
begin:vcard 
n:Ferris;Christopher 
tel;work:781-442-3063
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc;XML Technology Development
adr:;;One Network Drive;Burlington;Ma;01824-0903;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:chris.ferris@east.Sun.COM
title:Sr. Staff Engineer
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Christopher Ferris
end:vcard