RE: CPA and overrides

[Scott Hinkelman <srh@us.ibm.com>]

I believe it makes sense to have the CPAid optional, and load any needed
information into the header, as David B
points out. I think the CPAid should called ConfigInfo with a "type" like
Partyid and be ORed with a structure containing
the needed header data. Fundamentally, all we are talking about is
by-reference or by-value with some additional
process concerns for initial messages or bootstrap, which may not even need
to be spec'd.
The issue to me is not *if* it makes sense to have it either by-ref or
by-value, but *what* header data is needed.
That is what may not be able to be settled in time. This also is well in
line with breaking dependency between components
in ebXML.


Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer
XML Industry Enablement
IBM e-business Standards Strategy
512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074