Re: Issue: How CPA is used in the spec

[Colleen Evans <cevans@progress.com>]

Could one of you involved in this thread (Chris, David, Rich or Maryann)
please send me the finalized wording to be incorporated into the spec once
you've agreed.  Your emails are crossing and I'm not sure at this point
what has been agreed to or by whom.

Thanks,
Colleen

Rich Salz wrote:

> Yeah, the intent was "only do it if you know it's okay" otherwise who
> knows what will happen.  David's suggestion (which I hit "send" too
> early on) was do it or report an error.
>
> I think Chris's words come closer, except that I would change the last
> sentence to be:
>
> "If the receiving MSH generates an error, then it MUST report the
> inconsistency with an error message to the sender with an errorCode of
> Inconsistent and a severity of Error."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-transport-request@lists.ebxml.org