[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: ebXML Core Components Comments Procedure
Hello Can all formal comments regarding the draft core components paper entitled "methodology for describing core components" be addressed primarily to following recipients: Lisa Shreve (CC Team leader) lms@wwnet.com <mailto:lms@wwnet.com> Sue Probert (joint editor) sue@ets-edi.compulink.co.uk <mailto:sue@ets-edi.compulink.co.uk> James Whittle (joint editor) james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk <mailto:james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk> Hisanao Sugamata (Author) hsedi@ibm.net <mailto:hsedi@ibm.net> Martin Byan (Author) mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com <mailto:mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com> Of coarse I would encourage comments on this document to be copied to the listserve, but by following this procedure it enables formal comments to be handled distinct from general ones. The document is question can be found at the core components team site until it is published on the public site. http://www.ebxml.org/working/project_teams/core_components/ <http://www.ebxml.org/working/project_teams/core_components/> Kind regards James Whittle CC joint editor Tel. No. 44 (0)20 7655 9022 Fax No. 44 (0)20 7681 2278 10 Maltravers Street, LONDON, WC2R 3BX. www Address: www.e-centre.org.uk <http://www.e-centre.org.uk> e-mail james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk <mailto:james.whittle@e-centre.org.uk> Best business practice in a digital age. Important Notice The above information is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any use (including retransmission or copying) of this information by person(s) or entity other than the intended recipient is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please would you contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. The sender is not responsible for the completeness or accuracy of this communication as it has been transmitted over a public network. -----Original Message----- From: Miller, Robert (GXS) [mailto:Robert.Miller@gxs.ge.com] Sent: 01 June 2000 15:07 To: ebxml-core@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: Comments on ebXML Core Components forms I've no problem with notes and examples imbedded in 'Description', and so see no need for separate Notes and Examples subcomponents. I do have a problem with mandatory examples - 1) Examples are not appropriate to some things I might register. 2) I might want in the description to refer to written documentation (I'd put it on-line and refer to it via a URL). The written documentation misght for example cover an entire message or industry set of messages, and it might include examples therein. I'll give a 'maybe' to synonyms - 1) en:name and fr:name are not synonyms. 2) Many (most? all?) synonyms turn out to be 'almost synonyms'. It is perhaps better to treat all 'synonyms' as 'almost synonyms' and define them independently as subclasses of the same parent class. Of course, I wouldn't have any 'almost synonyms' in the Core Components, as these are the definitions upon which the 'off-by' are founded. Cheers, Bob P.S., 'DAMSAD'? Now there's an unhappy acronym! -----Original Message----- From: Martin Bryan [mailto:mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 6:56 AM To: ebxml-core@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: Comments on ebXML Core Components forms A member of the CEN/ISSS DAMSAD project team suggests that Descriptions ought to be able to have subcomponents of Notes and Examples, and that the provision of Examples should be compulsory. In addition a Synonyms field could be provided alongside the main Name field. What do people think about these as possible extensions to the CoreComponents DTD and do you consider they should form part of the data capture form or only be options in the final database? At a UK-DHG meeting yesterday it was decided that the User Community field needs to be split into two to capture details of Industry Sector and Business Process separately. We would like to adopt a coding scheme for identifying these, but do not feel that ISIC is adequate, or than UNSPSC is ready. Can anyone suggest a suitable classification scheme for identifying relevant industries and processes? Martin Bryan ======================================================================= = This is ebXML, the general mailing list for the ebXML committee = = The owner of this list is owner-ebxml@oasis-open.org = = = = To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@lists.oasis-open.org with = = the following in the body of the message: = = unsubscribe ebxml = = If you are subscribed using a different email address, put the = = address you subscribed with at the end of the line; e.g. = = unsubscribe ebxml myname@company.com = =======================================================================
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC