ebxml-architecture message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: Comment on Glossary
- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- To: Colin Barham <Colin.Barham@tie.nl>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 09:02:19 -0400
The following are my comments
regarding the Glossary7.xsl, sent 10 Oct 2000
1. I recommend that the following terms be omitted from the
Glossary. These terms are not unique to ebXML, nor is ebXML using
them in a distinctive way. They are commonly used terms in
information technology. Some of the definitions can be found in
dictionaries (e.g., Websters) or in documents such as the American
National Standard Dictionary of Information Technology
(http://www.ncits.org/tc_home/k5htm/ANSDIT.htm)
or Wiley’s Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. (I also assume
that there is a similar ISO document for IT Terminology)
- - Boolean,
Boolean Expression, Child, Datatype, Email Address, Parameter, Parent,
Semantics.
2. The definition of Implementation is confusing.
Unless there is a reason for this definition (is this what EDI specs
use?), I recommend either removing this term, since the definition
offered (if I understand it correctly) is not unique to ebXML or
replacing the term with:
- - An
implementation is the realization of a specification it can be a
software product, system, program. [Alternatively, you can list
items specific to ebXML: e.g., registry]
3. The definition of Component is confusing, unclear
and not precise. What does ‘non-trivial, nearly independent’ really
mean what is ‘nearly independent’ to one person, may not be to
another. Also, the first half of this definition does little to
enhance the definition. Recommend the following:
- - Component
a module of software that is a physical realization of a set of
interfaces. [note: if you don’t like the word module, how about part or
piece?]
4. For Terms to be Defined: Compliant
I recommend not using this term, rather use terms derived from
‘conformance’, which is already in the Glossary. So, rather than
using the term compliant, use conforming or conformant. Thus, we
don’t need to add another definition.
-Lynne
Lynne S. Rosenthal
NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970
(301)975-3353, fax (301)948-6213
lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC