Re: TA spec 1.0.1

[Duane Nickull <duane@xmlglobal.com>]

Almost all of the outstanding issues have been dealt with.  Currently, 
there is only one which we feel will be mitigated by this afternoon.

The suggestion of Anders will lead to our spec being postponed for
voting by the plenary for another three months.  This is not acceptable.

Everyone has had a chance to read the comments disposition.  This is not
a comment period.  As per Brian's email,  this is to review comments
disposition only.  The people who have submitted comments have been
satisfied with one exception that we are working on.

Let's move forwards, not sideways ;-)

Duane  

Nikola Stojanovic wrote:
> 
> <Anders Grangard>
> After reviewing the disposition document of the TA spec 1.0.1, I recommend
> that the specification and the disposition of the comments from the second
> review period are made available to the ebXML community. I am aware of that
> we today received some comments on the disposition document, but if we want
> to allow the ebXML members reasonable time to review what they are going to
> vote on next week, these should be dealt with in parallel. Any unresolved
> issue that remains after this week should be addressed at the steering
> committee meeting the 11 Feb.
> </Anders Grangard>
> 
> I support the same logistics with addition that the TA group should have a
> chance to review outstanding issues on Monday, February 12 as per your
> timelines.
> 
> Regards,
> Nikola Stojanovic
> Lead Technologist, Research and Development
> Encoda Systems, Inc.
> 101 Pineview Terrace
> Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
> nikola.stojanovic@encodasystems.com
> Tel: 607-273-2224