RE: BPSS meeting tomorrow, and agenda items

[Karsten Riemer <Karsten.Riemer@Sun.COM>]

I am seeing this as a BPSS meeting because it is a continuation of the meeting
Paul assigned as a BPSS meeting last time. But yes, you are right there is
only one meeting. W3C is on the agenda, as part of item 2. standards to track.
I think if there is enough material to discuss we should just go back to the
meeting structure we used to have, analysis meetings separate from BPSS
meetings. I think dedicated BPSS meetings are important because the other
standards in this space will not stand still until September when the UN is
ready to pick this up again.

-karsten


>At 10:08 AM 6/20/01, Welsh, David wrote:
>>Karsten,
>>1. Sorry but I've misplaced the original email, but don't we have a 
>>general BP meeting at the same time ?
>>* * *
>
>Hello all,
>
>(1) I am assuming Karsten's meeting notice today and Paul's 06/08/01 notice 
>are the same thing for the same meeting.
>
>(2)  Paul, as we will have some non-BPSS things to discuss, it would be 
>helpful to me to know, if these calls continue (and thanks again to 
>generous Telcordia), whether the scope of these calls is limited to BPSS 
>and who will be convening them.  If non-BPSS issues belong elsewhere, maybe 
>I need to conjure up another conference call.
>
>(3) I had sent off some agenda item possibilities to Paul.  I can't tell 
>whether P. and K. are collaborating or the agenda or not, but K's re-agenda 
>hits two of the three (BPMI and OAG) and misses one (W3C).   Can we add W3C?
>
>Thanks, see you tmrw  Jamie
>
>> > From: Karsten Riemer
>> > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 9:35 AM
>> > To: ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org
>> > Subject: BPSS meeting tomorrow
>> > Hi,
>> > We will have our next BPSS meeting tomorrow, see call in info
>>* * *  The agenda picks up where we left off last time, but I have
>> > re-arranged the sequence a bit, based on input from last meeting,
>> >
>> > Agenda for 6/21 BPSS meeting
>> > 1. Reports from adopters/evaluators of BPSS
>> >    1.a. Update from OAG (if any)
>> >    1.b. Update from RosettaNet (if any)
>> >    1.c. Update from Software vendors
>> > 2. Discussion of relationship between BPSS and other standards in this
>> > space: WSDL, WSFL, XLANG, BPML, and web services in general.
>> > Relationship between collaboration definition and process execution.
>> > 3. Review of items that we had previously postponed for a 'phase 2'.
>> >    3.a.   REA
>> >    3.b.   Transaction as a binary protocol
>> >    3.c.   Patterns and pattern parameters. How does it relate
>> > to the override capability.
>> >    3.d.   Review of rules and conditions
>> >    3.e.   Signal alignment
>> >    anything else I left out?
>> > 4. New ideas that should be on our plate.
>> >    Send them in in advance if you have some ideas.
>> > 5. Need for interfacing with other ebXML teams:
>> >    5.a. CC team on context model
>> >    5.b. UBL team on process correlation
>> >    5.c. CPP/CPA team on WSDL alignment, overrides, and
>> > executable process
>> >    5.d. Transport on process correlation, signal alignment
>> >    5.e. The new implementation and comliance group
>> >    others ... ?
>> >    Any activity on the developer alias?
>> > 6. Rough prioritizing of all of the above
>> > 7. Recruiting of active participants to do the work
>> >
>> > Please let me know what other topics you feel would be relevant.
>> >
>> > Here is the call information:
>> > Thursday, June 21, 1-2 p.m. EDT.
>> > As before, to access the call, dial 888-699-0348 domestically
>> > and  +1 732-336-6000 internationally,
>> > in either case use the PIN of 3042#
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> > -karsten
>
>   
>