OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-bp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: ebXML in W3C? (was) Re: 2 July BP meeting notes and 16 July BPmeeting notice


Jamie,
Regarding your comment, --and just to be clear to everyone,

>it was IBM's WSFL submission that tipped me off

We have not submitted WSFL anywhere as of this email. It is purely and IBM
specification.

Thanks,
Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer
XML Industry Enablement
IBM e-business Standards Strategy
512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074



James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@mmiec.com> on 07/03/2001 03:03:07 PM

To:   ebxml-bp@lists.ebxml.org
cc:
Subject:  ebXML in W3C?  (was) Re: 2 July BP meeting notes and 16 July BP
      meeting notice




>Karsten Riemer <Karsten.Riemer@Sun.COM> on 07/03/2001 08:48:51 AM:
>
>The question is to Jamie: Did you mean that UN/CEFACT should submit BPSS
>to W3C?


>Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 09:27:02 -0700
>From: Scott Hinkelman <srh@us.ibm.com>
>
>Is UN/CEFACT a member of W3C?

I don't know the answer to either question.  But I would like to.  If  the
ebXML work product is going to survive (versus being incorporated into
someone else's stuff), does it -need- to be submitted?   Actually, Scott,
it was IBM's WSFL submission that tipped me off to thinking about whether
W3C is in, and will become the real arbiter of, this space.

I think this is a topic that needs wider discussion.  Certainly,
some   intelligent outsiders and would-be users have -asked- why ebXML is
not before W3C.  (Along the lines of, "if not, why should I take this
seriously?")   I  would like to have an answer for public use, because my
alternatives currently are "they forgot", "they never planned to" or
"they're not telling".  None of these are optimal.   A continuing
ecological concern for ebXML work is whether participants are contributing
to a standard, or simply doing R&D for future products.  So I imagine the
new leadership, if and when it emerges, will need to address how the
standard is being managed vis-a-vis other standards.

Can anyone enlighten me on whether W3C submission was discussed prior to or
at Vienna?

Best regards   Jamie

James Bryce Clark
VP and General Counsel
McLure Moynihan Inc.
Chair, ABA Business Law Subcommittee on Electronic Commerce
jamie.clark@mmiec.com, jbc@lawyer.com
1 818 597 9475


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-bp-request@lists.ebxml.org




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help


Powered by eList eXpress LLC