Re: Updated draft document

[Alain Chapdaniel <alain.chapdaniel@actimum.com>]

Hello,
I totally agree with the proposition to find the description of
the model elements in the BSR.
best regards.

Alain Chapdaniel
alain.chapdaniel@actimum.com
ACTIMUM
http://www.actimum.com
----- Original Message -----
From: <melanie.mccarthy@gm.com>
To: <ebxml-ccbp-materials@lists.ebxml.org>
Cc: Lisa M. Shreve <lms@wwnet.com>; <mblantz@ltvsteel.com>;
<lisa.seaburg@commerceone.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 3:39 PM
Subject: Updated draft document


> During the EWG Meeting last week the Materials Management Team (D1)  had
the
> opportunity to review the first draft  that we had created during our San
Jose
> Meeting.  There was a major discussion regarding the "Address" model that
> suggested that an address probably  also includes  location information.
> Consider a mail address for a manufacturing receiving location, it  might
> include a specific dock number.  Attached is the revised document for your
> comment.  Notice that the group suggested that we might want to call this
'core
> component'   'Location' rather than 'Address'.  Also, during the
discussion we
> talked about the need for descriptions for each of the elements within the
> model.  It was proposed that information might be included in the BSR.
>
> Looking forward to hearing your thoughts regarding the revised draft, as
well as
> a draft list for the various blocks that we identified owners for at the
San
> Jose meeting  (I know, I am just as guilt for not submitting my proposed
list!)
>
> regards,
>
> Melanie
>
> (See attached file: mmdomain-location.ppt)
>