OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-coord message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: [Fwd: To the QA team]

this is the thread being conducted at the steering committee.

i suggest that Dick needs to respond to this outlying our role as per the comments by tony and nagwa:

i.e. we are not editors, we are not going to review details only the overall consistency and quality

I agree with Nagwa. The most we might want to do is determine "best practice"
for managing comments/input to evolving document and propagating these across
the various project teams.
At 09:29 AM 9/1/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Subject: Re: [Fwd: To the QA team]
>To: tmcgrath@tedis.com.au
>Cc: "'ebXML Coordination'" 
>I don't think we should be responsible for editing any documents, our
>responsibility is to evaluate that the documents are aligned with the 
>vision, validate the documents with the ebxml.org's approved requirements
>document, there is no overlaps or conflicts, and provide complete and correct
>information about the purpose of this document.

tim mcgrath
TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142

same process, but some one needs to make the process the same across all
teams... rik

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Rawlins [mailto:rawlins@metronet.com]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 11:33 AM
To: Ebxml-Stc
Subject: Re: To the QA team


Would you please clarify?  You say on the one hand that the team editor
should be in charge of the comment process, but yet you say that the qa team
should be responsible for and run the process across all teams.   Are you
referring to the same or different processes?


richard drummond wrote:

> Bob and Dick, as my team edits the documents, i seems to me it will be
> necessary that we extend our editing processes some what. the trp team has
> changed the comments forms and put a new column in which tell what kind of
> comment it is... such as technical, typo.... and such. also we need to
> the team editor function clearly the one in charge of the comment process.
> we have discussed this before. i think the qa team should be responsible
> this process across all teams. we, the stc, will have to put the process
> place and have qa run it. what do you think?  best regards, rik

Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EDI Consulting

tel;cell:+61 (0)438352228
fn:tim mcgrath

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help

Powered by eList eXpress LLC