OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-coord message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: RE: [Fwd: Fwd: Minutes - face to face meeting Chicago - 13/09/00]

  we spent 45 minutes in our last conf call talking about UDDI, and one of
our action items was to ask Jon Bosak, who has joined our group at least for
the time being, to contact Simon Nicolson of Sun to ensure that putting out
a coherent message about the UDDI/ebxml relationship was a topic at the
ebxml marketing committee meeting that was to be held right after our call.
I don't know whether Jon did this, but if he did the marketing folks didn't
report that they acted on our request. So we need to escalate this at the
next steering committee meeting.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dick Raman [mailto:Dick.Raman@cab-edi.net]
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 4:00 AM
> To: tmcgrath@tedis.com.au; 'ebXML Coordination'
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fwd: Minutes - face to face meeting Chicago -
> 13/09/00]
> I notice a reluctance in members of the StC on the topic of UDDI vs
> ebXML...The proposal I made last week had little or no 
> reaction - also from
> the QR team...Is this a view you guys share?  If so we should start
> pushing...
> Dick
> REMINDER...This was my view.....
> Dear All,
> I have been studying the UDDI stuff and it appears to me that 
> - apart from
> politics - we could very well work out that there is no 
> conflict between
> UDDI and ebXML.
> The UDDI stuff supports more the 'UDD' but not much the 'I', whereas
> ebXML -let's be fair- mostly ignored the 'Discovery' 
> part...until the SJ
> meeting when we set up the TPAteam.
> In fact we could say that we have concentrated in ebXML on 
> the what Gartner
> calls the "post-contract phase", whereas UDDI concentrates on the
> 'pre-contract phase'.  I know that many in ebXML are of the 
> opinion that the
> ideas of 'open-edi' should be part of the specs, but we have 
> been able to
> come up with a radical approach to the post-contract phase - 
> we have not
> come up with new stuff on the TP discovery part.
> UDDI is here now, and it brings two important players that 
> have been missing
> from ebXML: Microsoft and Ariba.  I think this is an 
> opportunity for all to
> embrace the UDDI initiative (with all its marketing power) 
> and to align it
> with ebXML.  We can now involve Microsoft and Ariba to come 
> up with one
> comprehensive spec to cover both the pre- and post contract 
> phase in B2B
> eCommerce, making UDDI non-proprietary and enhancing ebXML 
> with something
> the world needs also.
> Maybe we can welcome the UDDI people in the TPA team - maybe 
> renaming it to
> UDD Team - and work together in Tokyo.
> Dick Raman
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <ebxml-coord-errors@lists.ebxml.org>
> To: 'ebXML Coordination' <ebxml-coord@lists.ebxml.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 4:17 AM
> Subject: [Fwd: Fwd: Minutes - face to face meeting Chicago - 13/09/00]
> > there appears to be no discussion regarding a position on UDDI.
> >
> > do we need to escalate this?
> >
> > --
> > regards
> > tim mcgrath
> > TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
> > phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142
> >
> >

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help

Powered by eList eXpress LLC