Re: [Fwd: Fwd: Minutes - face to face meeting Chicago - 13/09/00]

[Dick Raman <Dick.Raman@cab-edi.net>]

I think your point is clear...we need to escalate this at the next Stc
Telemeeting!

Dick


----- Original Message -----
From: <ebxml-coord-errors@lists.ebxml.org>
To: 'Dick Raman' <Dick.Raman@cab-edi.net>; <tmcgrath@tedis.com.au>; 'ebXML
Coordination' <ebxml-coord@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 5:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Fwd: Fwd: Minutes - face to face meeting Chicago - 13/09/00]


> Dick,
>   we spent 45 minutes in our last conf call talking about UDDI, and one of
> our action items was to ask Jon Bosak, who has joined our group at least
for
> the time being, to contact Simon Nicolson of Sun to ensure that putting
out
> a coherent message about the UDDI/ebxml relationship was a topic at the
> ebxml marketing committee meeting that was to be held right after our
call.
> I don't know whether Jon did this, but if he did the marketing folks
didn't
> report that they acted on our request. So we need to escalate this at the
> next steering committee meeting.
>
> bob
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dick Raman [mailto:Dick.Raman@cab-edi.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 4:00 AM
> > To: tmcgrath@tedis.com.au; 'ebXML Coordination'
> > Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fwd: Minutes - face to face meeting Chicago -
> > 13/09/00]
> >
> >
> > I notice a reluctance in members of the StC on the topic of UDDI vs
> > ebXML...The proposal I made last week had little or no
> > reaction - also from
> > the QR team...Is this a view you guys share?  If so we should start
> > pushing...
> >
> > Dick
> >
> > REMINDER...This was my view.....
> >
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I have been studying the UDDI stuff and it appears to me that
> > - apart from
> > politics - we could very well work out that there is no
> > conflict between
> > UDDI and ebXML.
> > The UDDI stuff supports more the 'UDD' but not much the 'I', whereas
> > ebXML -let's be fair- mostly ignored the 'Discovery'
> > part...until the SJ
> > meeting when we set up the TPAteam.
> > In fact we could say that we have concentrated in ebXML on
> > the what Gartner
> > calls the "post-contract phase", whereas UDDI concentrates on the
> > 'pre-contract phase'.  I know that many in ebXML are of the
> > opinion that the
> > ideas of 'open-edi' should be part of the specs, but we have
> > been able to
> > come up with a radical approach to the post-contract phase -
> > we have not
> > come up with new stuff on the TP discovery part.
> > UDDI is here now, and it brings two important players that
> > have been missing
> > from ebXML: Microsoft and Ariba.  I think this is an
> > opportunity for all to
> > embrace the UDDI initiative (with all its marketing power)
> > and to align it
> > with ebXML.  We can now involve Microsoft and Ariba to come
> > up with one
> > comprehensive spec to cover both the pre- and post contract
> > phase in B2B
> > eCommerce, making UDDI non-proprietary and enhancing ebXML
> > with something
> > the world needs also.
> > Maybe we can welcome the UDDI people in the TPA team - maybe
> > renaming it to
> > UDD Team - and work together in Tokyo.
> >
> > Dick Raman
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <ebxml-coord-errors@lists.ebxml.org>
> > To: 'ebXML Coordination' <ebxml-coord@lists.ebxml.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 4:17 AM
> > Subject: [Fwd: Fwd: Minutes - face to face meeting Chicago - 13/09/00]
> >
> >
> > > there appears to be no discussion regarding a position on UDDI.
> > >
> > > do we need to escalate this?
> > >
> > > --
> > > regards
> > > tim mcgrath
> > > TEDIS   fremantle  western australia 6160
> > > phone: +618 93352228  fax: +618 93352142
> > >
> > >
> >