[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DTD & Sample - Specification Schema for review
Karsten et al > 2. There is no apparent difference between "document" (representing > "Structured Document") and "aggregate", other than one can be in a document > set and one can not - so why have the distinction? (The same is true for > document-set, but some people seem to Really want this). It is not clear what the role of "document attributes" are. Your documents do not seem to refer to message instances, or to the schemas that should identify permitted message structures. What is the relationship between the attributes defined in the ebXMLSpecification and those defined for the root element of a transaction message? Martin Bryan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC