Re: Party XML Schema Defintions

[David RR Webber <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Message text written by Martin Bryan
>>
> This would also depracate the need for the <communicationPoint>
> element.  The CPP would be grabbed from a Registry using the default
> static Registry CPA (RIM??).

No, No, No. You should not need to refer to the registry from every
message.
Message types are linked to the registry, not message instances.
Information
that is instance specific should remain a part of the message. If as a part
of message validation you want to check that the message contents match the
CPP contents then you do a match, using XSLT, between the contents of one
element in the instance with the contents of the referenced CPP document.
You do not expect the data required by the user to be taken from the
registry because you cannot guarantee access to it will not be denied at a
critical time.

Martin<

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Martin,

I think you extrapolated this - you would only need to do this on the
first occurence of a new CPP - or a change of CPP version (same thing).

Thereafter you would have it cached locally.

DW.