[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Tag Languages, UID's etc. - My experiment with the Beacon BDR
I hope it is not going on tangent, but I support this point (of re-using prevalent terminology) whole heartedly. Regards, Devendra Tripathi VidyaWeb, Inc 90 Great Oaks Blvd #206 San Jose, Ca 95119 Tel: (408)226-6800, Direct: (408)363-2375 Fax: (408)226-6862 > -----Original Message----- > From: David RR Webber [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 9:21 AM > To: INTERNET:stuart.campbell@tieglobal.com > Cc: 'ebXML Core' > Subject: RE: Tag Languages, UID's etc. - My experiment with the Beacon > BDR > > > Message text written by INTERNET:stuart.campbell@tieglobal.com > > > 'dont tell me about all this complex architecture and techy details, what > my > community wants to know is "what do i call my elements and in what case"' > > The user community is looking for guidance. Some will follow. Some wont. > But at least there is guidance for the things they want. > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > Stuart, great point - and I also have found this out first hand with the > CatXML.org work that I have done. > > We approached this by saying - this is an open approach, and > immediately the users said - tell us what tags we should use? Which > is counter-intuitive - what they are really saying is 'design us a > default that works'. > > But where did I go to find those tags? I did not go to a BDR or a BSR > or some techie spec'. I went to existing industry catalogue work and > found vocabularies there already and re-used those. > > This is the whole key - no need to invent yet another set of terms. > Each industry group already has these close by - and yes the > industry group itself should take the lead in building the tag-sets. > > Microsoft - since you mention them - are also masters at this > technique - working with industry groups to establish a standard, > getting them to use DCD, VB, and create DBO's thereby > locking in the Microsoft speak to the whole process. But this does > NOT extend down to the tag level - key thing to notice. > > My sense is we create two or three reference implementations such > as CatXML.org - where people can freely access all the documentation > and materials. Plagurism then does the rest. Easy to use Word, > Ctrl-F / Replace All / Change 'CatXML' to 'FooBarXML' / - Save As ! > > Flexibility should be the approach here - not attempting to decree for > all industry situations just one inflexible approach. > > DW. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC