Re: Code and Text as Entities or Representation Types?

[Mike Rawlins <rawlins@metronet.com>]

Yeah, I guess there is at least an implied comment in how I framed the
question.  However, I did want to make sure I understood correctly the
intent.   My comment will basically be along the lines of needing to tighten
up the specification in regard to representation types:

   * Representation types need to be more rigidly defined (I will have
     suggestions)
   * Representation types are not entities (and we shouldn't have entities
     named after them)

Mike

Lisa Shreve wrote:

> Mike,
>
> It sounds like you have already made your comment.
>
> lms
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Rawlins" <rawlins@metronet.com>
> To: "ebXML-core" <ebxml-core@lists.ebxml.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:23 PM
> Subject: Code and Text as Entities or Representation Types?
>
> > Again referring to appendix A (forgive me if I dwell on your example
> > rather than the specifications, but the examples help flesh out issues
> > with the specifications).
> >
> > We have Code.Details and Text.Details which are aggregates, and we have
> > "code" and "text", respectively, as basic entities.  However, "code" and
> > "text" are also referenced as representation types.
> >
> > Question for clarification before comment:  What are they?  Do you
> > intend these to be both basic entities and representation types?  If
> > only one, which one?
> >
> > --
> > Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
> > http://www.metronet.com/~rawlins/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> > "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-core-request@lists.ebxml.org

--
Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
http://www.metronet.com/~rawlins/