[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: More on [BSR] and the Problems of Using a Dictionary-based Approachto Defining Business Semantics
At the CEN/ISSS EC Workshop Meeting, 13 & 14 March, in London, a paper was prepared by the DAMSAD Project Group as a problem statement regarding the ebXML Core Components model, entitled - appropriately enough -"The Problems of Using a Dictionary-based Approach to Defining Business Semantics." More information on the Workshop Meeting is at http://www.cenorm.be/isss/Workshop/ec/News/News.htm. Incendiary quotes abound, like: "The ebXML initiative has heavily promoted the benefits of formally modelling business processes, using the Unified Modeling Language (UML), yet the core components defined for use within messages have not been formally modelled. As a result they, like all preceding dictionary-based approaches, fail to define easily reusable or extensible data types." "At present the ebXML Core Component team are only seeking to create a dictionary of semantic definitions. They are not formally modelling classes, or seeking to make the names of their properties reusable in different contexts. They are using a limited set of representation types, which have not been formally defined and for which no mechanisms for identifying context-dependent subsets have been provided." This sounds just like it came out of the mouth of Martin Bryan, or perhaps Mike Conroy. My questions, assuming ebXML Core Components doesn't just adopt xCBL wholesale, are: 1) will ebXML CC heed these DAMSAD observations, and 2) though François Vuilleumier, the ISO/TC154 chair, has assured us that - in so many words - the ISO BSR is not "dead," aren't the same criticisms applicable to the BSR? William J. Kammerer FORESIGHT Corp. 4950 Blazer Pkwy. Dublin, OH USA 43017-3305 +1 614 791-1600 Visit FORESIGHT Corp. at http://www.foresightcorp.com/ "accelerating time-to-trade"
Powered by eList eXpress LLC