[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] ebXML CPA/CPP Estimate
Thanks for the reference. Do you mean to make the defaults mandatory to use for all participants in any business process whatsoever? I could see that your defaults would then be relevant to the issue I posed. I also think you will have little luck getting people to use them and them alone. I would give it a .0001 on the analyst spectrum. Dale -----Original Message----- From: Bernd Eckenfels [mailto:b.eckenfels@seeburger.de] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Dale Moberg Cc: mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com; EDI-L, List; ebxml-dev Subject: Re: [ebxml-dev] ebXML CPA/CPP Estimate > > >Gee Berndt, I don't know how we missed this! >Next time you should come to a meeting and >explain to everyone what the "reasonable defaults" >on all transport, acknowledgement, NRR, >reliable messaging, signals, signatures, >trust anchors, certificates, digital envelopes, >transport security should be for all types of >all business collaborations > Just read the RegRep CPA Bootstrap Draft. Greetings Bernd
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC