RE: [ebxml-dev] Article: Will UN/CEFACT torpedo ebXML?

[Scott Nieman <snieman@venturipartners.com>]

I think Klaus may participate in this soon, but I will state that he
verbally stated that CC needs to do this work in Feb at the Seattle meeting,
and previously MANY times at the ebXML meetings.  I read this as the
proverbial "we".

I plan to revise my email as official comments to the CC spec.

For the record, I have stated in the past that TMWG may need to do this work
for CC, and demonstrate the overlap.  Specifically, mapping the context
parameters found in the CC spec to UMM.

Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael C. Rawlins
To: Scott Nieman; 'ebxml-dev '
Sent: 5/2/2002 7:35 AM
Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] Article:  Will UN/CEFACT torpedo ebXML?

Scott,

Without getting involved in the technical merits of your arguments I do 
want to point out one small item:

At 07:12 AM 5/2/02 -0700, Scott Nieman wrote <snipped>:
>Mike,
>The task to find where CC fits in UMM was not a TMWG responsibility,
but
>that of the CC group.  You appear to be purposely flipping this around
for
>some odd reason.

The way I see it, if this is getting flipped around it is by Mr.
Naujok's 
e-mail, and not by my essay.

Cheers,


---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
www.rawlinsecconsulting.com