Re: [ebxml-dev] Article: Will UN/CEFACT torpedo ebXML?

[Dave Welsh <dave@collaborativedomain.com>]

Mike,
Scott is absolutely correct.
As BP approached the TMWG on the matter of UMM suggestions, it was clear
from the Seattle working meetings that other eBTWG teams (CC, ..) need to do
the same (and take initiative to approach TMWG) if needed on the UMM.

-Dave



----- Original Message -----
From: Michael C. Rawlins <mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com>
To: Scott Nieman <snieman@venturipartners.com>; 'ebxml-dev '
<ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:35 AM
Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] Article: Will UN/CEFACT torpedo ebXML?


> Scott,
>
> Without getting involved in the technical merits of your arguments I do
> want to point out one small item:
>
> At 07:12 AM 5/2/02 -0700, Scott Nieman wrote <snipped>:
> >Mike,
> >The task to find where CC fits in UMM was not a TMWG responsibility, but
> >that of the CC group.  You appear to be purposely flipping this around
for
> >some odd reason.
>
> The way I see it, if this is getting flipped around it is by Mr. Naujok's
> e-mail, and not by my essay.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
> www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> The ebxml-dev list is sponsored by OASIS.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.ebxml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>