"Monica J. Martin" wrote: > > shodZ wrote: > > >im with david. ebXML is becoming just too complex, without delivering > >teh real promises. i did rather put my bet on GXA(Global XML > >WebServices Architecture) now, which is being co-authored by > >Microsoft(majority) and IBM. atleast it is based on standards which > >have been really tested out there in the market(yeah man, i`m talking > >about SOAP) > > > > > mm: Two important points: (1) Web services are an implementation option > for SOA. That does not preclude the use of ebXML specifications in the > SOA world. In addition, and to be clear: If you stack up the GXA > architecture of almost/greater than/at least 50 specifications, That's surprising - last time I counted it was about half that (at most). Do you have any reference on this? Kind Regards, Joe Chiusano Booz | Allen | Hamilton Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World > complexity seems to also apply [1]. (2) Either specifications sets or > even a mix of both could be used to meet customers' needs. In addition, > a convergence effort is being guided by AIAG automotive to seize the > benefit of all the relevant technologies. > > Thanks. > > [1] All technologies could be relevant and important. > > The ebxml-dev list is sponsored by OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The > list archives are at http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-dev/ > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: > <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/> -- Kind Regards, Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz | Allen | Hamilton The ebxml-dev list is sponsored by OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/>
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>