[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] [ubl-dev] RE: [ebxml-dev] Q: minimum requirement for ebxml?
Stephen, Please note the update at the bottom of the page regarding CCTS conformance. Mark Mark R. Crawford Senior Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components LMI Government Consulting 2000 Corporate Ridge McLean, VA 22102-7805 703.917.7177 Phone 703.655.4810 Wireless The opportunity to make a difference has never been greater. www.lmi.org <http://www.lmi.org> -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk] Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 7:07 AM To: ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org Subject: [ebxml-dev] [ubl-dev] RE: [ebxml-dev] Q: minimum requirement for ebxml? Folks As one who has worked on UBL for a year now I'm virtually jumping up and down for joy to see a company producing products which realise what I personally have so wanted to see delivered with ebXML and UBL - i.e. products with real promise for small and medium sized enterprises and small businesses which allow them to deal with the larger companies in what I hope will be a cost effective way. Full marks from me to Accountis. http://www.accountis.com/accountis/index.html Their advertised plans to open some of this up as opensource too is great news for our open and royalty free standards efforts. IMHO of course :-) http://www.accountis.com/accountis/modelsource.html Stephen Green >>> <AlanKotok@cs.com> 03/08/04 14:28:58 >>> David, et al: The latest issue of ebXML Forum has an article on the use of ebXML with electronic invoicing that describes a service from Accountis, a British company. Accountis's service includes plug-ins for secure transfers using ebMS and integration with leading accounting packages. See http://www.ebxmlforum.org/articles/ebFor_20040724.html . Alan Kotok AlanKotok@cs.com http://www.technewslit.com/ Editor, ebXML Forum, http://www.ebxmlforum.org/ david.lyon@computergrid.net wrote: > >I've been doing that. One of the packages that I'm looking at is ebMail >from Hong Kong. It looks very useable and advanced. > >Maybe I need a plugin, but it seems to use smtp to transfer data. That >would be fine as far as I can see for most SMEs. > >What is your opinion on using this package for ebxml? > >Quoting Anthony Ellis <anthony.ellis@redwahoo.com>: > >> What do you mean by ebxmlish? >> For the app to be considered an ebxml compliant messaging service it >> would need to provide all of the 'core' functionality in the ebXML >> Messaging Service Spec. >> Easiest way to test this is to obtain one of the 'available' >> messaging service implementations on the internet and see if your app >> can communicate with them. >> >> ANTS >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: david.lyon@computergrid.net >> [mailto:david.lyon@computergrid.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 11:27 AM >> To: ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org; ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org >> Subject: [ebxml-dev] Q: minimum requirement for ebxml? >> >> >> Q: Say we have an application, and it produces UBL messages and sends >> them via SMTP. Is that ebxmlish enough to be called ebxml. My reading >> of the specs seem to suggest that it might be. >> >> If not, what other things need to be added? >> >> One thing to keep in mind is that the customers are not multi-billion >> dollar multinationals, but SMEs. They don't have an IT department, >> don't know what ebxml even is probably aren't that interested. >> >> I'm interested in hearing some different opinions on this. None of >> the specifications that are written really have all that much about >> doing ebxml within a small or medium sized enterprise. They give the >> impression of being are primarily focussed on larger organisations. >> >> One possible answer of course is that it is impossible for an sme to >> use ebxml because their business processes don't meet the requirements of ebxml. >> >> In the first instance, I'm just interested to know if an SMTP app >> with UBL can pass as ebxml. >> >> Regards >> >> David >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC