OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
Re: [ebxml-dev] ebXML implementations/experience

Interesting question, and it makes me think about your problem in a much 
different way. I suggest that before you think about sending anything to 
channels like Google and Yahoo that you contact them to see first 
whether or not they accept such data, and second how *they* want to 
receive it. They're probably not going to do anything special just for you.

I don't recall search advertising ever being specifically considered as 
a use case for messages and business documents in the ebXML work.  In 
general terms, UBL is based on some of the core ebXML work, like core 
components. I am not familiar with their latest message set, but I don't 
recall anything that specifically addresses this use case.

-----------------------------------------
Michael C. Rawlins, Senior Software Engineer, GXS
Sent from personal account


On 10/27/2011 2:47 PM, Neil Davudo wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for all the pointers. How is UBL related to ebXML?
>
> My questions stem from me recommending to my company that leveraging ebXML and UBL will help them. It is a retailer trying to send their product information to various search advertising channels like Google and Yahoo. What I am also trying to find out is whether these areas (e.g. search advertising) were considered while defining the messages and business documents.
>
> Neil
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pim van der Eijk<lists@sonnenglanz.net>
> To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 4:52 AM
> Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] ebXML implementations/experience
>
>
>
> There are some case studies posted to http://ebxml.xml.org/
> and other sites that discuss business drivers in some
> projects that deployed ebXML technology. 
>
> The question is hard to answer in general because ebXML
> involves multiple components (messaging, registry, core
> components, CPP/CPA, BP) and few deployments are comparable.
> They use different subsets of components for very diverse
> applications.   What type of implementations in which
> industry sectors are you intested in?
>
> There is support for ebXML Messaging 2.0 in many B2B
> integration products, and most of these support multiple B2B
> protocols.  License costs typically depend on parameters
> like number of CPUs or number of trading partners to connect
> rather than on particular (ebMS or other) B2B protocols.
>
> Pim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Davudo [mailto:neil_davudo@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 11 October 2011 19:46
> To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: [ebxml-dev] ebXML implementations/experience
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there any documents covering the benefits and cost of
> ebXML implementations by various companies and any learnings
> about ebXML itself in terms of its success and failures?
>
> Thanks,
> Neil
>
>
>


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]