RE: [ebxml-dev] ebXML implementations/experience

[Markus Gudmundsson <markus@unimaze.com>]

According to this information "It is a retailer trying to send their product information ..." and the fact that they are using UBL I would guess they are using the UBL 2.0 Catalogue document schema.

Best regards, Markus

-- 
Markús Guđmundsson l markus@unimaze.com
Managing Director / Consultant

Sendill | http://www.sendill.is
Unimaze Software l http://www.unimaze.com 

"Sendill" and "Unimaze" are registered trademarks of Unimaze Software.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Rawlins [mailto:mcr2@rawlinsecconsulting.com] 
Sent: 27. október 2011 21:00
To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: Re: [ebxml-dev] ebXML implementations/experience

Interesting question, and it makes me think about your problem in a much different way. I suggest that before you think about sending anything to channels like Google and Yahoo that you contact them to see first whether or not they accept such data, and second how *they* want to receive it. They're probably not going to do anything special just for you.

I don't recall search advertising ever being specifically considered as a use case for messages and business documents in the ebXML work.  In general terms, UBL is based on some of the core ebXML work, like core components. I am not familiar with their latest message set, but I don't recall anything that specifically addresses this use case.

-----------------------------------------
Michael C. Rawlins, Senior Software Engineer, GXS Sent from personal account


On 10/27/2011 2:47 PM, Neil Davudo wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for all the pointers. How is UBL related to ebXML?
>
> My questions stem from me recommending to my company that leveraging ebXML and UBL will help them. It is a retailer trying to send their product information to various search advertising channels like Google and Yahoo. What I am also trying to find out is whether these areas (e.g. search advertising) were considered while defining the messages and business documents.
>
> Neil
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pim van der Eijk<lists@sonnenglanz.net>
> To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 4:52 AM
> Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] ebXML implementations/experience
>
>
>
> There are some case studies posted to http://ebxml.xml.org/ and other 
> sites that discuss business drivers in some projects that deployed 
> ebXML technology.
>
> The question is hard to answer in general because ebXML involves 
> multiple components (messaging, registry, core components, CPP/CPA, 
> BP) and few deployments are comparable.
> They use different subsets of components for very diverse
> applications.   What type of implementations in which
> industry sectors are you intested in?
>
> There is support for ebXML Messaging 2.0 in many B2B integration 
> products, and most of these support multiple B2B protocols.  License 
> costs typically depend on parameters like number of CPUs or number of 
> trading partners to connect rather than on particular (ebMS or other) 
> B2B protocols.
>
> Pim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Davudo [mailto:neil_davudo@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 11 October 2011 19:46
> To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: [ebxml-dev] ebXML implementations/experience
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there any documents covering the benefits and cost of ebXML 
> implementations by various companies and any learnings about ebXML 
> itself in terms of its success and failures?
>
> Thanks,
> Neil
>
>
>