[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-mktg-sc] [Fwd: [CEFACT-LWG:261] ebXML legal issues]
Monica, I'm a graduate of the NCC, a former member of DSDM, and a member of BCS, and I'm shocked and dismayed at the level of disinformation and knowledge in the field that this article exhibits, a fact that the author freely acknowledges! I am writing to ask that the offending document be removed from any online resources by the NCC, and that David Marsh issue a retraction. It's been a while since we saw an article this confused and ill-informed. That it should eminate from the UK is doubly distressing, since the overall standards that UK publications uphold are of the highest. What kind of peer review did this article have, if any? The author makes the most basic errors, and completely fails to mention the specific IP, and discuss the actual legal statements made by the parties concerned and the formal submissions to ebXML that have fully resolved these issues already. But instead infers that there are some mysterious "road-block" patents that could apply. His grasp of patent issues in the United States is rudimentary. As a holder of two US Patents for software technology I feel able to comment on how business uses and interacts with patent holders, and it is not how he infers at all. There has been much written on this topic and he fails to reference even one authoritative source in this area. His statement that "ebXML is too immature for there to be neat solutions" is just completely against the real facts. The ebXML standards have gone through one of the most rigorous processes known, and further more these have been implemented by dozens of major corporations such as Fujitsu, Sun, and Sybase, and validated in major industry production environments. As our documentation at http://www.ebxml.org attests. Not to mention the fact that his example about EDIFACT messages shows how ignorant he is - since the whole premise of his rambling falters on the fact that EDIFACT messages can be transmitted and received by ebXML implementations!!! I hope we can speedly resolve this matter and move on. Those people that have received a link to this item should be re-informed via a new email announcement that it has been removed due to the low quality of the information it contains, and notified that in future more strenous efforts will be made to validate content prior to publication. Monica, thanks for bringing this matter to our attention. David RR Webber, B.Sc, University of Kent at Canterbury, Co-Author "ebXML - The New Global Standard for Business via the Internet", by New Riders Publishing, and Chair of the OASIS CAM TC. ======================================================== Message text written by "Monica J. Martin" > Carol, I think there should be some type of official response to this article. I have concerns about it singling out ebXML, and do not understand how patents issues are limited to ebXML. Thanks.<
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC