Tokyo POC choreography - regrep

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

Hi all,

	As we are discussing, it would be nice if we all get the configuration and
other partner information from a regrep implementation. To that effect, here
are my suggestions and queries:

	1.	Define Information Set - I think P.12 of SJ POC which lists the min
required information, is a good starting point.

	2.	Are we all are getting the partner information we need from an external
source - hopefully from a file in XML format ? If so, then we can abstract
this functionality and redirect it to a regrep implementation as needed.
Also, if we start doing this now, we will also know what information we need
from the regrep.

	3.	It would be good if we can workout some integration at the LA meeting.
To that end, I am slowly trying to develop a regrep implementation (which of
course, will be finalized after the regrep specs is done). I am looking to
work with somebody to start integration, at least at the messaging level and
exchanging test documents. So when the regrep is finalized, we can do the
real integration.

		I know that we are still working on the matrix et al. I just want to see
if there is anybody whom I can start working together, sharing ideas et al.

	cheers

-----Original Message-----
From: David RR Webber [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 9:36 PM
To: Farrukh Najmi
Cc: ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org; richard drummond
Subject: Re: Tokyo POC choreography - my 2c ;-)


Message text written by Farrukh Najmi
>
While I have the above stated opinion, I want to hear what Krishna, POC
team and other teams driving
the POC feel regarding this issue.
If the decision is to show discovery then together we will make it happen
come hell or high water.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Farrukh,

the GUIDE classification layer coupled to the BP definition and a simple
set of XML
profiles for each company would make a very easy demonstration in Tokyo
POC.  XML
search engines like GoXML can eat this for breakfast - we already have this
kind of
scenario live over the internet today.   You would see the XML, the
criteria, the Query
interface, and then a resulting HTML menu where you could pick a partner to
interact to.
If instead you wanted to do this in batch mode from say a TRP module to
validate
a interface parameter, this would also be possible.

I've been holding back from going there however - because I wanted to make
the
Tokyo POC RegRep side of things as vendor neutral as possible, and based on
the
spec's to date.

This maybe the right moment however to re-visit this if you truely wanted
to respond
directly to UDDI.

Thanks, DW.