[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: POC and Trading Partner Agreements
Message text written by Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM > There will be no specification before Vancouver. IBM and the team would not object if the POC team looks at the tpaML Proposal from IBM as a starting point. Sig Handelman <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Sig, By our self-professed rules - I believe this means we should pull the TPA functionality from the PoC. Frankly this would help make the whole easier to digest and implement right now as we face a mountain of work prior to Tokyo. We can leave in a stub - in anticipation of the Vancouver PoC, as each PoC looks to be a logical step up from the previous. Thanks, DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC