RE: AIAG Sample Schema and a sample Business Document

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

Nick,

	Are you talking about a min set of information that is useful and can be
packaged as a tpa ? Assuming yes, I can take that up, especially as I am
writing the tpa merge service.

	Sig, can you get us your input and ideas for a minimalist tpa ? What are
your plans for the BP/CC demo ? Are there any tpas involved ? and if so, how
would they look like ?

	My plan was to start with the config info table from SJ and package it in
the tpa form. The elements as they stand now are :

	DUNS	:	666666666
	Contact/Last Name	:	Breissinger
	Contact/Email :	marcb@webMethods.com
	Contact/Telephone :	703-555-2500
	Preferred Connectivity : HTTP
	HTTP	: http://ebxml.webmethods.com/invoke/wm.b2b.ebxml/receive
	SMTP	: ebxmlhandler@webmethods.com
	FTP	:
hostname=ebXML.webmethods.comport=8021username=Default;password=<none>
path=/ns/wm/b2b/ebxml/receivefile extension=ebx

	We can map these elements into the tpa and also add couple of elements
which pertains to  supported business processes.


	cheers

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Kassem [mailto:Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 11:33 AM
To: Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM; ebxml-Poc
Cc: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Subject: Re: AIAG Sample Schema and a sample Business Document


I suggest we (the POC team) specify the needed *run-time* information so
that we can at least claim conceptual alignment. However we can't
characterize this as ebXML TPA.
Could I have a volunteer to spec this out (need to keep this to the minimum
info we need) ?

Regards,
Nick

At 01:40 PM 10/5/2000 -0400, Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Just spoke to Martin Sachs.
>
>There will be no specification before Vancouver.
>
>IBM and the team would not object if the POC team looks at the tpaML
>Proposal from IBM as a starting point.
>
>Sig Handelman