RE: AIAG Sample Schema and a sample Business Document

[Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM <swhandel@us.ibm.com>]

Hello,

I can work with some people and put together a minimalist TPA and this will
be a topic at the ebXML TP f2f next week. For the demo, we were planning
for
simple static profiles, and we have very sample transport scenario which
doesn't complicated rules. This has been discussed on the Transport list
also.

Regards, Sig

"Krishna Sankar" <ksankar@cisco.com> on 10/05/2000 03:38:57 PM

To:   "Nicholas Kassem" <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com>, Sigmund
      Handelman/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "ebxml-Poc" <ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org>
cc:   Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
Subject:  RE: AIAG Sample Schema and a sample Business Document



Nick,

     Are you talking about a min set of information that is useful and can
be
packaged as a tpa ? Assuming yes, I can take that up, especially as I am
writing the tpa merge service.

     Sig, can you get us your input and ideas for a minimalist tpa ? What
are
your plans for the BP/CC demo ? Are there any tpas involved ? and if so,
how
would they look like ?

     My plan was to start with the config info table from SJ and package it
in
the tpa form. The elements as they stand now are :

     DUNS :    666666666
     Contact/Last Name   :    Breissinger
     Contact/Email :     marcb@webMethods.com
     Contact/Telephone : 703-555-2500
     Preferred Connectivity : HTTP
     HTTP : http://ebxml.webmethods.com/invoke/wm.b2b.ebxml/receive
     SMTP : ebxmlhandler@webmethods.com
     FTP  :
hostname=ebXML.webmethods.comport=8021username=Default;password=<none>
path=/ns/wm/b2b/ebxml/receivefile extension=ebx

     We can map these elements into the tpa and also add couple of elements
which pertains to  supported business processes.


     cheers

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Kassem [mailto:Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 11:33 AM
To: Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM; ebxml-Poc
Cc: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Subject: Re: AIAG Sample Schema and a sample Business Document


I suggest we (the POC team) specify the needed *run-time* information so
that we can at least claim conceptual alignment. However we can't
characterize this as ebXML TPA.
Could I have a volunteer to spec this out (need to keep this to the minimum
info we need) ?

Regards,
Nick

At 01:40 PM 10/5/2000 -0400, Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Just spoke to Martin Sachs.
>
>There will be no specification before Vancouver.
>
>IBM and the team would not object if the POC team looks at the tpaML
>Proposal from IBM as a starting point.
>
>Sig Handelman