RE: POC and Trading Partner Agreements

[Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM <swhandel@us.ibm.com>]

Hello,

Your phrasing is correct with one change. TPA should be PA (Partner
Agreement). Martin Sachs just told me.

Regards, Sig


"Krishna Sankar" <ksankar@cisco.com> on 10/05/2000 02:45:26 PM

To:   Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "ebXML poc"
      <ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org>
cc:   Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
Subject:  RE: POC and Trading Partner Agreements



Hi,

     How would we refer to the TPA in the POC ? Proposed ebXML TPA from the
ebXML TP team ?

     cheers

-----Original Message-----
From: Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM [mailto:swhandel@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 10:58 AM
To: ebXML poc
Cc: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Subject: Re: POC and Trading Partner Agreements



Hello,

 I am resending, I had the wrong subject in my last e-mail.

Just spoke to Martin Sachs.

There will be no specification before Vancouver.

IBM and the team would not object if the POC team looks at the tpaML
Proposal from IBM as a starting point.

Sig Handelman