[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: POC and Trading Partner Agreements
Hello, Your phrasing is correct with one change. TPA should be PA (Partner Agreement). Martin Sachs just told me. Regards, Sig "Krishna Sankar" <ksankar@cisco.com> on 10/05/2000 02:45:26 PM To: Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "ebXML poc" <ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org> cc: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS Subject: RE: POC and Trading Partner Agreements Hi, How would we refer to the TPA in the POC ? Proposed ebXML TPA from the ebXML TP team ? cheers -----Original Message----- From: Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM [mailto:swhandel@us.ibm.com] Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 10:58 AM To: ebXML poc Cc: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Subject: Re: POC and Trading Partner Agreements Hello, I am resending, I had the wrong subject in my last e-mail. Just spoke to Martin Sachs. There will be no specification before Vancouver. IBM and the team would not object if the POC team looks at the tpaML Proposal from IBM as a starting point. Sig Handelman
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC