FW: URGENT - Time sensitive information

[Hatem ElSebaaly <hatem@ipnetsolutions.com>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Hatem ElSebaaly 
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 7:36 PM
To: 'Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com'; 'PDeSmedt@viquity.com'
Subject: RE: URGENT - Time sensitive information


Phillip/Nick,

IPNet is fully committed to do the following:

- participant acts as a responder
- participant uses HTTP for messaging (per ebXML TR&P Messaging Service
spec)
- participant uses SMTP for messaging


We will also attempt to do:
- participant acts as a requestor
- participant acts as a hub

I apologize for the late response.

Thanks
Hatem


-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Kassem [mailto:Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 5:08 PM
To: ebxml-Poc
Subject: URGENT - Time sensitive information


Dear POCers,

Following todays POC conf. call it is clear that we have a long way to go 
and relatively little time. There is a remarkable level of commitment form 
the participants of the POC WG to see a successful outcome to the Tokyo 
event. We would like to be as inclusive as possible and have as broad a 
participation as is practical. Having said this we are under severe time 
constraints and the scope of this activity needs to defined asap. To this 
end, it is now imperative that you contact Philippe DeSmedt 
<PDeSmedt@viquity.com> and indicate your level of 
commitment/capabilities/roles no later than 12 p.m. on Friday (10/6). 
Please note that if you fail to respond to Philippe we will assume you are 
no longer in a position to participate in the Tokyo POC and your name will 
be dropped from the matrix. You may of course choose to rejoin the 
Vancouver POC.

In addition I am aware that the POC proposal is still being heavily 
re-worked. Please note that Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com> is now the 
single point-person on pulling this  document together. He is of course 
counting on our full and timely support. He in turn is available to respond 
to proposal specific questions at any time - feel free to contact him
directly.

The electronic vote on the proposal will close on Monday (10/9). I need to 
know whether we feel the proposal is good enough for submission to the stc 
and I plan to forward a status message to the stc. I am not planning on 
shifting these dates/time. The document does not have to be finished but it 
needs to be good enough for review by the stc. They need to see and bless 
the general direction in which we are heading. Hope this works for you all.

Regards,
Nick

>Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 15:48:55 -0700
>To: ebXML-poc <ebXML-poc@lists.ebxml.org>
>From: Nicholas Kassem <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com >
>Subject: Re: ebXML PoC conference call - reminder
>
>Given that we are running out of time and in the interest of getting 
>something useful done at our f2f , I propose the following Agenda:
>
>1) Review capability matrix and close on the list of participants - this 
>is needed for planning purposes - logistics etc.
>2) Review POC proposal. Note that I would like to have the proposal 
>forwarded to the STC by COB Friday so I would like to do an e-vote on the 
>proposal on or before 12 noon (PDT) on Friday. I am looking for a 2/3 
>majority prior to forwarding it for review. Each company gets one vote 
>only (I don't get to vote unless there is an impasse).
>3)  Review Sid's f2f agenda
>4) Open issues
>5) Review AI's
>
>Regards,
>Nick