[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Tokyo POC for vote
FN, Your salute implies there are two groups - Krishna and then friends ;-) The line numbers are there in the document. We need to do View-Print Layout. I think we will send in the pdf version next time. How do we convert word to pdf ? Will change the RR to V0.08. I will add the difference between discovery and dynamic negotiation in the doc to make it clear. Can you/Mark close the loop on TPA/TP/PP et al. What we need is DTDs and samples for profile and TPA. They can be the same and based on tpa-1_0_6. Sanjay raised a point about some runtime stuff missing in the tpa dtd. If so, we might need to add a couple of elements there. May be not and that is fine. Once again can you and Mark close the loop - offline ? cheers -----Original Message----- From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 11:02 AM To: Krishna Sankar Cc: Ebxml-Poc Subject: Re: Tokyo POC for vote Krishna and friends, Greta Job! Some thought/points below: -We need to show line numbers in the online version of this doc for making refs easier. -The RR Services reference should be to v0.8: -PpV1.0.dtd, TPAV1.0.dtd?: Which spec are these DTDs from. We should not be inventing stuff in POC. I am very concerned about any spec work going on in POC. We should be implementing right now and specs should be frozen. Note there are 26 days till show time! -I want to make a clarification between TPA discovery and TPA negotiation. We will show dynamic discovery of content (e.g. PP), based on Browse and Drill down queries between Regsitry Browser and Registry based on RR Services v0.8 spec. We will not show dynamic negotiation of TPa between buyer and seller since this business process in not speced anywhere yet. Krishna Sankar wrote: > Fellow POCers, > > Here is the Tokyo POC document for voting. Nick wants the votes to be in By > Tuesday noon. The document has all the stuff required to implement the ebXML > POC for the Tokyo meeting. There are a few details missing (like a couple of > examples, DTDs etc) which we can develop as we move along. > > The document also contains the participant matrix and allocation. > > Please send an e-mail to the list for any corrections, questions, > suggestions et al. > > cheers and happy voting > > BTW, I missed the cob Sunday deadline by 12 minutes ;-) as it is 12:12 AM ! > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > | | Krishna Sankar > :|: :|: Member of technical Staff > :|||: :|||: Internet Commerce > ..:|||||||:..:|||||||:.. (Ph) 408-853-8475 > Cisco Systems Inc ksankar@cisco.com > ---------------------------------------------------------- > "Failure is certain if we don't, > but Success is uncertain even when we do. > So the choice is Ours, always..." > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Name: ebXMLTokyo POC Proposal-005.doc > ebXMLTokyo POC Proposal-005.doc Type: WINWORD File (application/msword) > Encoding: BASE64 -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC