RE: Tokyo POC for vote

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

FN,

	Your salute implies there are two groups - Krishna and then friends ;-)

	The line numbers are there in the document. We need to do View-Print
Layout. I think we will send in the pdf version next time. How do we convert
word to pdf ?

	Will change the RR to V0.08.

	I will add the difference between discovery and dynamic negotiation in the
doc to make it clear.

	Can you/Mark close the loop on TPA/TP/PP et al. What we need is DTDs and
samples for profile and TPA. They can be the same and based on tpa-1_0_6.
Sanjay raised a point about some runtime stuff missing in the tpa dtd. If
so, we might need to add a couple of elements there. May be not and that is
fine. Once again can you and Mark close the loop - offline ?

	cheers


-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 11:02 AM
To: Krishna Sankar
Cc: Ebxml-Poc
Subject: Re: Tokyo POC for vote


Krishna and friends,

Greta Job!

Some thought/points below:

-We need to show line numbers in the online version of this doc for making
refs easier.

-The RR Services reference should be to v0.8:

-PpV1.0.dtd, TPAV1.0.dtd?: Which spec are these DTDs from. We should not be
inventing
stuff in POC. I am very concerned about any spec work going on in POC. We
should be
implementing right now and specs should be frozen. Note there are 26 days
till show
time!

-I want to make a clarification between TPA discovery and TPA negotiation.
We will show
dynamic discovery of content (e.g. PP), based on Browse and Drill down
queries between
Regsitry Browser and Registry based on RR Services v0.8 spec. We will not
show dynamic
negotiation of TPa between buyer and seller since this business process in
not speced
anywhere yet.




Krishna Sankar wrote:

> Fellow POCers,
>
>         Here is the Tokyo POC document for voting. Nick wants the votes to
be in By
> Tuesday noon. The document has all the stuff required to implement the
ebXML
> POC for the Tokyo meeting. There are a few details missing (like a couple
of
> examples, DTDs etc) which we can develop as we move along.
>
>         The document also contains the participant matrix and allocation.
>
>         Please send an e-mail to the list for any corrections, questions,
> suggestions et al.
>
>         cheers and happy voting
>
>         BTW, I missed the cob Sunday deadline by 12 minutes ;-) as it is
12:12 AM !
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>        |          |             Krishna Sankar
>       :|:        :|:            Member of technical Staff
>      :|||:      :|||:           Internet Commerce
>  ..:|||||||:..:|||||||:..       (Ph) 408-853-8475
>     Cisco  Systems Inc          ksankar@cisco.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> "Failure is certain if we don't,
>            but Success is uncertain even when we do.
>                          So the choice is Ours, always..."
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                       Name: ebXMLTokyo POC
Proposal-005.doc
>    ebXMLTokyo POC Proposal-005.doc    Type: WINWORD File
(application/msword)
>                                   Encoding: BASE64

--
Regards,
Farrukh