OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-poc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Fw: Confusion on RM


For your convenience, here is Reliable Messaging specification

And the following modification should be applied on Spec ver0.080,
because it was discussed at last TR&P teleconference on 10/5.

   Kazunori IWASA
   Industry Relations, Fujitsu Software Corporation
   3055 Orchard Drive, San Jose, CA 95134-2022
   TEL: +1(408)456-7983  FAX: +1(408)456-7930
   e-mail: iwasa@fs.fujitsu.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philippe DeSmedt" <PDeSmedt@viquity.com>
To: "Ebxml-Poc" <ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org>
Cc: "'Nicholas Kassem'" <nick.kassem@eng.sun.com>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:41 PM
Subject: RE: Confusion on RM

> All,
> A quick note to echo Nick's observations regarding reliable messaging.
> Please note that the matrix from the start had the question phrased as
> 'participant can communicate through reliable messaging (per ebXML TR&P
> Reliable Messaging spec)'. As Nick points out, it would be useful to read
> through v0.080 of that spec prior to the call on Thursday.
> Regards,
> -Philippe
> _______________________________
> Philippe De Smedt
> Architect
> Viquity Corporation (www.viquity.com)
> 1161 N. Fair Oaks Avenue
> Sunnyvale, CA 94089-2102
> (408) 548-9722
> (408) 747-5586 (fax)
> pdesmedt@viquity.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Kassem [mailto:nick.kassem@eng.sun.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:28 PM
> To: Ebxml-Poc
> Subject: Confusion on RM
> Dear POCers,
> In reviewing the POC material over the week-end it is clear that there is
> some confusion over what was meant by Reliable Messaging in the POC
> Most of us support Relaible Messaging in some shape or form (which we can
> not show in Tokyo). The question that needs answering is who is committed
> to optionally show ebXML RM (Ver0.080) at the Tokyo POC. I plan to raise
> this for discussion on our weekly conf. call so please  take the time and
> read the spec (again). Thanks in advance.
> Regards,
> Nick
> p.s. Keep in mind that one of the key roles POC plays is to provide
> feed-back to other WGs. So if you aren't happy with the RM Spec and plan
> not to support it on technical grounds, ebXML TRP needs your input.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help

Powered by eList eXpress LLC