RE: Demonstrating Reg/Rep

["Munter, Joel D" <joel.d.munter@intel.com>]

farrukh, 
if the RR APIs are sufficiently defined, then why are you advocating this
scope reduction?  
thanks,
joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:45 PM
To: JP Morgenthal
Cc: ebxml-Poc (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Demonstrating Reg/Rep


The RR api side of the vocabulary is adequate for showing this functionality
to
the best of my knowledge. However, as a scope reduction it may be OK to not
exercise this functionality in the POC demo. This would imply that all
content
would be pre-existing in the RR. Krishna do you feel this is a reasonable
scope
reduction to avoid submission during the demo?


JP Morgenthal wrote:

> All,
>
>         In section 2.2.3 of the ebXML Registry and Repository Registry
> Services Proposal, there is a definition of a service to submit the
required
> schema documents to the repository.  Do we wish to demonstrate this
> capability as part of track 1?  It also allows for Business Process
> documents, but I believe the vocabulary for this part has not been
completed
> as of yet.
>
> JP
>
> =============================
> JP Morgenthal
> CTO
> XMLSolutions Corporation
> VM: (703) 506-1111 x 7306
> C: (703) 298-5630
> E: jp.morgenthal@xmls.com

--
Regards,
Farrukh