OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-poc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: Demonstrating Reg/Rep

Hi Joel,

I am *not* advocating the scope reduction. I am simply saying that it may be OK
for POC demo to focus on what is really important (browse/drill down discovery
based on classification schemes) and not show less important (routine stuff)
like submission. The only reason POC would consider this is if there is just too
little demo time and too much to show.

Again the important points I am making are:

1. The RR api is adequate for showing submission (something JP was questioning
and I am dispelling the misconception)
2. Whether to exercise this functionality in the demo is up to the POC team
defining the demo scenraio
3. Browse and Drill down discovery based on classification schemes is more
important to show than submission

Hope this helps.



"Munter, Joel D" wrote:

> farrukh,
> if the RR APIs are sufficiently defined, then why are you advocating this
> scope reduction?
> thanks,
> joel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:45 PM
> To: JP Morgenthal
> Cc: ebxml-Poc (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Demonstrating Reg/Rep
> The RR api side of the vocabulary is adequate for showing this functionality
> to
> the best of my knowledge. However, as a scope reduction it may be OK to not
> exercise this functionality in the POC demo. This would imply that all
> content
> would be pre-existing in the RR. Krishna do you feel this is a reasonable
> scope
> reduction to avoid submission during the demo?
> JP Morgenthal wrote:
> > All,
> >
> >         In section 2.2.3 of the ebXML Registry and Repository Registry
> > Services Proposal, there is a definition of a service to submit the
> required
> > schema documents to the repository.  Do we wish to demonstrate this
> > capability as part of track 1?  It also allows for Business Process
> > documents, but I believe the vocabulary for this part has not been
> completed
> > as of yet.
> >
> > JP
> >
> > =============================
> > JP Morgenthal
> > CTO
> > XMLSolutions Corporation
> > VM: (703) 506-1111 x 7306
> > C: (703) 298-5630
> > E: jp.morgenthal@xmls.com
> --
> Regards,
org:Sun Microsystems;Java Software
adr:;;1 Network Drive, MS BUR02-302;Burlington;MA;01803-0902;USA
fn:Farrukh S. Najmi

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help

Powered by eList eXpress LLC