RE: Registry Headers

[Mark Hale <hale@ajubasolutions.com>]

With respect to the ebXML Headers required to interact with RegRep, we need
to finalize on the header info.  I think that the suggestion that I made
earlier went on a long-winded tangent.  Please permit to back up and see if
we can reach consensus.

Step 1:  The header looks the following where and we are trying to reach
consensus on --A-- and --B--

	<ebXMLHeader>
	  <Header>
	    <TPAInfo>
	      <TPAId context = "POC">
	        CPA/CPAInfo/CPAName
	      </TPAId>
	      <ConversationId context = “POC
	        uid@requester-domain [from request message]
	      </ConversationId>
	      <ServiceInterface>     --A--    </ServiceInterface>
	      <Action>  --B--      </Action>
	    </TPAInfo>
	  </Header>
	  ...
	</ebXMLHeader>

Step 2:  I propose the values of A & B should be:

 --A-- == Object Query Manager
  Note:  This is only one of several service interfaces
 --B-- == GetRootClassificationNodesRequest
  Note:  This is only one of several actions within the interface

Step 3:  I suggested the locations of A & B in the cpp-cpa DTD in the e-mail
sent earlier.  Please do not use the locations in the header.  Rather I
thought I would tell you exactly where you can find the values of A & B in
the DTD:

--A-- == CPA/BusinessProtocol/BusinessInterface/ServiceInterface?InterfaceId
--B-- ==
CPA/BusinessProtocol/BusinessInterface/ServiceInterface/ActionMenu/Action/Re
quest/RequestMessage


	Thanks,

	Mark



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Hale [mailto:hale@ajubasolutions.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 3:12 PM
> To: ebXML-poc
> Subject: Registry Headers
>
>
> JP raised a good point.  First, I would like to add some
> background.  JP is
> referring to the ebXML headers for messages going to the RegRep
> and not the
> CPA itself.  There are two things that must be considered, the CPP/CPA and
> the header.  Though we now have the CPA DTD from Marty, the TPAInfo in the
> headers are not fully aligned (to prove it TPAInfo ceases to exist in the
> DTD).  In fact, a proposal hit the thread today to align the two.
>
> IMHO, I would like to augment JP's proposal from earlier and suggest the
> following (I've inserted the full element locations in a RegRep
> CPA into the
> ebXML Header sample):
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> <ebXMLHeader>
>   <Header>
>     <TPAInfo>
>       <TPAId context = "POC">
>         CPA/CPAInfo/CPAName
>       </TPAId>
>       <ConversationId context = “ItemAlignment">
>         uid@requester-domain [from request message]
>       </ConversationId>
>       <ServiceInterface>
>
> CPA/BusinessProtocol/BusinessInterface/ServiceInterface?InterfaceId
>       </ServiceInterface>
>       <Action>
>
> CPA/BusinessProtocol/BusinessInterface/ServiceInterface/ActionMenu
> /Action/Re
> quest/RequestMessage
>       </Action>
>     </TPAInfo>
>   </Header>
>   ...
> </ebXMLHeader>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Example Data:
>
> CPA/BusinessProtocol/BusinessInterface/ServiceInterface?InterfaceI
> d = Object
> Query Manager
> CPA/BusinessProtocol/BusinessInterface/ServiceInterface/ActionMenu
> /Action/Re
> quest/RequestMessage = GetRootClassificationNodesRequest
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> 	Thanks,
>
> 	Mark
>
>