Re: ebXML PoC -- feedback to working groups

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com>]

Philippe,

I assume the custom CPA proposal/acceptance protocol was just to fill a hole in
the POC flow for Tokyo. IMHO, a general purpose Event Notification mechanism
that is based on a general puprose publish/subscribe mechanism is a better
alternative. Note that I made a proposal for such a service which articulates
the CPA proposal/acceptance scenario as an example. The proposal can be found
at:

    http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-regrep/200010/msg00033.html

See section 1.3 for CPA proposal/acceptance protocol related example.

--

Regards,
Farrukh

Kenji Nagahashi wrote:

> <snip>
>
> [TP,TRP] Bootstrapping problem in CPA proposal have to be resolved. POC
> assumed the CPA proposal/acceptance is a well-known service and exchanged
> message between implicitly agreed interfaces. In reality, Its transport
> information have to be either predescribed by ebXML specification or found
> in the to-be-partner's CPP obtained from registry. Later case requires the
> means (and its spec) with which CPA accepter can find which CPP to use, ex.
> attatching CPP (or its URL) with the proposed CPA.

--
Regards,
Farrukh

begin:vcard 
n:Najmi;Farrukh 
tel;fax:781-442-1610
tel;work:781-442-0703
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.sun.com
org:Sun Microsystems;Java Software
adr:;;1 Network Drive, MS BUR02-302;Burlington;MA;01803-0902;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:najmi@east.sun.com
fn:Farrukh S. Najmi
end:vcard