[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: ebXML SF press event -- update on scenarios and such
Philippe, > * NTT-COM will participate in the TPA formation scenario if Fujitsu > and Netfish agree -- could someone from these companies please confirm? > thanks. Absolutely, Fujitsu welcome NTT-COM joining. And I think the proposed scenario looks good. ------------------------------------------------------- Kazunori IWASA Industry Relations, Fujitsu Software Corporation 3055 Orchard Drive, San Jose, CA 95134-2022 TEL: +1(408)456-7983 FAX: +1(408)456-7979 e-mail: iwasa@fs.fujitsu.com ------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe DeSmedt" <PDeSmedt@viquity.com> To: "'ebXML poc'" <ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org> Cc: <ed.julson@eng.sun.com>; <carol.geyer@oasis-open.org>; <susan.struble@eng.sun.com>; <simon.nicholson@eng.sun.com>; <steven.yung@sun.com>; <joe.dalman@tiecommerce.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 7:38 PM Subject: ebXML SF press event -- update on scenarios and such > All, > > Thanks to those who have responded to my e-mail last evening on scenarios > for the SF ebXML press event's PoC. Let me address some of the points that > were made, and request your assistance in crafting the scenarios: > > * webMethods has expressed interest in participating; at Tokyo, their > participation was thwarted due to a hardware failure; I welcome them back, > and we'll need to figure out a way to integrate them into the proposed > scenarios (see below); > * the question was raised by Joe Dalman of TIE Commerce why we're > suggesting to show AIAG rather than GCI: I don't have a strong preference > either way; the reason I picked AIAG is because of the way we've allocated > the participants to the tracks: after doing the allocations for tracks 1 and > 2, IBM and IPNet are the participants that are left to show an actual > messaging scenario; given that they are all set up for the AIAG scenario, I > thought it best to stick with that (for the sake of minimizing the > possibility of introducing changes that might destabilize a working demo); > * Ed Julson brought up a very important point: we need to allow enough > time to write the slides and scripting to go with the screens that we will > be showing; we need to ASAP decide what screens to show, so that Ed and his > team can work on the slides; Nick: is it possible to send the slides that > you presented at Tokyo?; a good first cut would be for Ed et al. to map the > existing slides against the scenarios that we are suggesting for the SF > demo; I assume that the screens that we'll show will be pretty much the same > ones as at Tokyo, but of course fewer of them, to comply with the new scaled > down scenarios; > * NTT-COM will participate in the TPA formation scenario if Fujitsu > and Netfish agree -- could someone from these companies please confirm? > thanks. > > I won't be able to attend tomorrow's PoC conference call, as I am traveling. > However, Nick has suggested that we focus tomorrow's call on the Vancouver > PoC, rather than on the San Francisco event. Therefore, please use the > e-mail forum to discuss issues related to the SF event. If need be, we'll > set up a separate conference call next week to discuss. > > As far as webMethods is concerned, I would suggest that we try to integrate > them into track 3, i.e., the AIAG scenario, as another buyer. In other > words, we'll have two buyers, two sellers, and one hub in that scenario. Any > objections? > > Given that we're running out of time, I'd like to get consensus on the > proposed scenarios as soon as possible, Monday at the latest. The sub-team > can then get together to hammer out the details and work with the marketing > team to help craft the business message and the accompanying slides. > > If you have any issues with the proposed scenario, please let the entire PoC > team know as soon as you can. > > Thanks. > > -Philippe > _______________________________ > Philippe De Smedt > Architect > Viquity Corporation (www.viquity.com) > 1161 N. Fair Oaks Avenue > Sunnyvale, CA 94089-2102 > (408) 548-9722 > (408) 747-5586 (fax) > pdesmedt@viquity.com >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC