RE: Security Proposal

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

Bill / Lloyd,

	Welcome to the POC team. I am sure you have the numbers for today's POC con
call at 9:00 PST.

cheers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Dunigan [mailto:bdunigan@cyclonecommerce.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 6:19 AM
> To: Krishna Sankar; dick@8760.com; ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: RE: Security Proposal
>
>
> Hi, I'm Bill Dunigan, an Engineer from Cyclone Commerce.
> Lloyd Kurth, Cyclone's Chief Architect, and I would like to join the POC
> also.  Since we are coming in so late, we'll try to listen and learn at
> first but we do intend to actively participate.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krishna Sankar [mailto:ksankar@cisco.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 8:21 PM
> To: dick@8760.com; ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: RE: Security Proposal
>
>
> Dick,
>
> 	Welcome to the POC ! Here is my take on the POC participation:
>
> 	The participation is basically attending the weekly con calls (every
> Thursday 9:00 PST), subscribing to the POC list, proposing POC
> scenarios and
> implementing some part of one or more proposals.
>
> 	We are at the proposal stage with the final vote coming up
> this Thursday.
> You have a chance to propose a PGP based Security scenario (As
> Vancouver is
> more technological in nature, a technical security proposal is
> fine), Hatem
> from IPNet and Sid from Netfish are also interested in a security
> proposal.
>
> 	Once the proposals are voted in, each participant can offer
> the roles and
> capabilities they want to participate as and discuss during the f2f (to be
> in SJ sometime in January). Then it is implement one's part, work with
> others to integrate one's roles and off to the conference !
>
> 	cheers
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dick Brooks [mailto:dick@8760.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 6:00 PM
> > To: ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org
> > Subject: RE: Security Proposal
> >
> >
> > Dear POC'ers,
> >
> > If the POC used PGP there would be no need for a CA. The POC
> participants
> > would simply exchange public keys (which also cost $0, as
> compared to PKI
> > certificates). Would POC implementers be interested in using PGP
> > for payload
> > security (encryption/digital signature) during the POC?
> >
> > Also, Group 8760 may be interested in participating in the
> Vancouver POC,
> > what is the process for participating?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dick Brooks
> > Group 8760
> > 110 12th Street North
> > Birmingham, AL 35203
> > dick@8760.com
> > 205-250-8053
> > Fax: 205-250-8057
> > http://www.8760.com/
> >
> > InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions
> >
> >
>