RE: Which version of the TRP spec

[Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>]

Chris et al,
	Thanks. That is what I would like to see as well. IMHO, the POC and similar
efforts should be based on the latest specifications - especially as we are
very close to 1.0 (I hope ;-)). But with the caveat that the specs should be
deemed implementable based on constraints - like time and resources.

cheers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 4:36 PM
> To: Scott Hinkelman
> Cc: Krishna Sankar; Eric Vickery; ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: Re: Which version of the TRP spec
>
>
> A version will be published following the face2face in london
> this week that will serve as the basis for vancouver poc efforts.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
>
> Scott Hinkelman wrote:
> >
> > Krishna,
> > I have sensed that .91 has caused at least some controversy and
> I believe
> > it premature to
> > say "we should follow the 091x." at this moment.
> >
> > Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer
> > XML Industry Enablement
> > IBM e-business Standards Strategy
> > 512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
> > srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074
> >
> > Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com> on 01/09/2001 05:53:12 PM
> >
> > To:   Eric Vickery <eric@8760.com>, ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org
> > cc:
> > Subject:  RE: Which version of the TRP spec
> >
> > Eric,
> >
> >    We should follow the 0.91x. From what I gather, there should
> not be that
> > many changes to 0.91x. So if we start working with 0.91x and
> make the final
> > changes as soon as the f2f changes are in, we should be OK. 0.8x is an
> > older
> > version and so it is not a good practice to use it.
> >
> >      Another major question is which version of the TPA (CPP/CPA) are we
> > going
> > to use. Again, we will have to use the version coming out in
> the next few
> > weeks.
> >
> >      cheers
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Eric Vickery [mailto:eric@8760.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:57 PM
> > > To: ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org
> > > Subject: Which version of the TRP spec
> > >
> > >
> > > Group 8760 is working on an implementation for the next POC demo and I
> > was
> > > wondering which version of the TRP spec the POC will be
> using. There are
> > > significant changes in the spec between 0.8 and 0.91 and in the
> > > interest of
> > > interoperability I would assume that the group will agree to
> > > follow a single
> > > version of the spec for the demo.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eric Vickery
> > > Group 8760, LLC
> > > 110 12th Street North
> > > Birmingham, AL 35203
> > > eric@8760.com
> > > 205-250-8053
> > > Fax 205-250-8057
> > > www.8760.com
> > >
> > > InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions
> > >
> > >
>