Re: POC Conf. Call - 1/11/01 @ 9 a.m. PST

[iwasa <iwasa@fsc.fujitsu.com>]

Just question.

Was it decided not to have POC demonstration in Vancouver
formally? Or is it just proposal? Just wanna make sure it was
already decided or not.

I guess it was decided to have more time to prepare at Vancouver
for the demonstration at 'Geneva'.

-------------------------------------------------------
   Kazunori IWASA
   Industry Relations, Fujitsu Software Corporation
   3055 Orchard Drive, San Jose, CA 95134-2022
   TEL: +1(408)456-7983  FAX: +1(408)456-7979
   e-mail: iwasa@fs.fujitsu.com
-------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicholas Kassem" <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com>
To: "ebXML POC" <ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 1:09 PM
Subject: POC Conf. Call - 1/11/01 @ 9 a.m. PST


>
> Dear POCers,
>
> I have included the agenda for tomorrow's meeting at the end of this
e-mail
> and the call details are also included. For the benefit of some of the
> newer participants in the POC I thought I should clarify our original
> mission in this WG. I am not in the least bit opposed to changing the
> mission but I think *this* WG should at least have a chance to discuss and
> agree on any potential changes.
>
> The goal of the POC from the outset has been to focus on the ebXML
> specifications and to identify the most stable portions of the
> specifications as candidates for implementations within a POC context. Any
> such implementations would need to be cast into a framework that would be
> relevant to the broader community. I think we have come a long way since
> Brussels and it's important that we stay in sync and collectively agree to
> the direction we are heading. There is a great deal of work ahead of us
and
> we need to be clear about the criteria we plan to use for declaring
> victory. So in a nut shell and as far as I'm concerned (and others may
> disagree), the POC is all about the ebXML specifications. We owe it to the
> relevant WGs to provide concrete and formal feedback. This feedback is key
> to getting the specs to a point where they can be broadly implemented.
>
> Having said all of this, I'm supportive of what Sid and Mark H. have been
> doing with respect to Vancouver and Geneva/?? planning. Using Vancouver as
> a stepping stone for Geneva/?? and beyond is a sound move and will allow
> the POC WG to thoroughly digest the specs.
>
> - The f2f meeting scheduled for the end of January in the Bay Area has now
> been folded into the Vancouver meeting
>
> - There will not be a POC demonstration in Vancouver; subsequently, the
> proposals submitted will be formally and collectively reviewed in
Vancouver
>
> - There will be a POC working group meeting during Vancouver for members
to
> work on systems tests and for members to work with the other ebXML working
> groups (TR&P, RR, TP, BP/CC) to solidify the specifications
>
> - There will be separate planning meetings in Vancouver to discuss
upcoming
> events beyond Vancouver
>
> Regards,
> Nick
>
>
>
> AUDIO ACCESS INFORMATION:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> USA Toll Free Number: 888-566-5907
> USA Toll Number: +1-712-271-3965
> PASSCODE: 34136
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> Agenda (1/11/01 @ 9 a.m. PST)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1) POC administrative issues (Nick/Sid)
> 2) Vancouver WG meetings (Mark)
> 3) Specification status (All)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>