re: agenda for tokyo

[David RR Webber <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Message text written by Yutaka Yoshida
> Are we going to re-consider the whole architecture
   again or are we going to do a 'bug fix' if the things proven not
   to be ok in POC? I strongly disagree restarting the whole
   architecture discussion again because we don't have that kind of
   luxury.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Yutaka,

This stuff is subjective.  Many of us want to table alternate approaches
here.   I'm not seeing this is a tear-up and start again - rather a natural
progression - we've learned alot about what does and does not
work - and we need to start with a review there.   We are missing 
basic functionality and the XML is ugly and in some places broken.
I do not wanted to be married to where we are right now.  We need
to take time to stop and get this right before rushing ahead.

There is still work to be done on creating a solid, simple, clear 
and easy to use underpinning that is broadly compatible with 
OASIS, eCo, Schema and UDDI and SOAP / XP.

We don't have that yet is my summation, but we can get there.
If we get concensus in Tokyo on this, and get it fixed, then all
the other stuff will be alot easier to do afterwards.

DW.