RE: Priorities for Vancouver POC

["Mark A. Hale" <mark.hale@interwoven.com>]

I would like to comment as an outside observer to the RegRep work.  I am
happy to see that there is a consensus for Ad Hoc Queries.  I feel that this
is an essential component to the untested portion of RegRep in the context
of ebXML:  the formation of business messages using core components.  I
think that in the choreography we should address core components and go
beyond just the partner profiles as done in some of the TP work and as
demonstrated in Tokyo.  Realizing that this requires additional
specifications for the registered components, the demonstration will require
some synchronization among the WGs and I am optimistic we can show it.

	Thanks,

	Mark


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 10:04 AM
> To: Munter, Joel D
> Cc: 'Prasad Yendluri'; ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: Re: Priorities for Vancouver POC
>
>
> I strongly agree with Prasad. Ad hoc queries will make our Registry really
> capable.
>
> My priority is:
>
> 1. Ad hoc query.
> 2. Basic Authentication and Authorization
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
> "Munter, Joel D" wrote:
>
> > reply:
> >
> > I strongly disagree. I believe that there are many issues yet
> to be dealt
> > with that are heavily dependent upon a well designed and
> specified security
> > model.  e.g., We have yet to address the security aspects of
> "distributed"
> > registry/repository.  Security must be specified and worked
> sooner rather
> > than later.
> >
> > In direct contrast, I believe that Ad Hoc query can easily be
> added later.
> >
> > Joel
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:06 PM
> > To: ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
> > Subject: Re: Priorities for Vancouver POC
> >
> > Farrukh,
> >
> > IMHO security (authetication or authorization) is a well
> understood aspect
> > and will easily fall in place anytime.  Enriching the "registry"
> > capabilities should be a priority. Hence I would vote for ad hoc query
> > capability
> >
> > Thanks, Prasad
> >
> > Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> >
> > > In today's POC con call today I was asked to gather input from the
> > > Registry team on our priorities for Registry functionality that should
> > > be implemented and shown for Vancouver. The one guideline we must bear
> > > in mind is that any functionality that we suggest for POC must be
> > > speced.
> > >
> > > According to our phased delivery plan developed at Tokyo, we have the
> > > following new functionality planned for our specs for Release 1
> > > (Vancouver time frame):
> > >
> > > -Registry security (authentication and authorization)
> > > -Ad hoc query capability
> > >
> > > Please share your sense of priorities for what Registry functionality
> > > should be implemented and shown for the Vancouver POC. Please indicate
> > > priority (1 being highre priority than 2).
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Farrukh
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>