OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: RE: Priorities for Vancouver POC


I agree that Security should be thought out earlier, and the f2f in Boston
should help next week. I would add one more priority as mentioned yesterday
the call.

We should look how to tie the POC  over a phone line or the Internet to a
real business to demonstrate a busines process.

Regards, Sig

                    "Munter, Joel                                                                                    
                    D"                     To:     "'Prasad Yendluri'" <pyendluri@webmethods.com>,                   
                    <joel.d.munter@        ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org                                              
                    intel.com>             cc:                                                                       
                                           Subject:     RE: Priorities for Vancouver POC                             
                    12/01/00 12:52                                                                                   


I strongly disagree. I believe that there are many issues yet to be dealt
with that are heavily dependent upon a well designed and specified security
model.  e.g., We have yet to address the security aspects of "distributed"
registry/repository.  Security must be specified and worked sooner rather
than later.

In direct contrast, I believe that Ad Hoc query can easily be added later.


-----Original Message-----
From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:06 PM
To: ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: Re: Priorities for Vancouver POC


IMHO security (authetication or authorization) is a well understood aspect
and will easily fall in place anytime.  Enriching the "registry"
capabilities should be a priority. Hence I would vote for ad hoc query

Thanks, Prasad

Farrukh Najmi wrote:

> In today's POC con call today I was asked to gather input from the
> Registry team on our priorities for Registry functionality that should
> be implemented and shown for Vancouver. The one guideline we must bear
> in mind is that any functionality that we suggest for POC must be
> speced.
> According to our phased delivery plan developed at Tokyo, we have the
> following new functionality planned for our specs for Release 1
> (Vancouver time frame):
> -Registry security (authentication and authorization)
> -Ad hoc query capability
> Please share your sense of priorities for what Registry functionality
> should be implemented and shown for the Vancouver POC. Please indicate
> priority (1 being highre priority than 2).
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help

Powered by eList eXpress LLC