Re: Priorities for Vancouver POC

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com>]

I strongly agree with Prasad. Ad hoc queries will make our Registry really
capable.

My priority is:

1. Ad hoc query.
2. Basic Authentication and Authorization

--

Regards,
Farrukh

"Munter, Joel D" wrote:

> reply:
>
> I strongly disagree. I believe that there are many issues yet to be dealt
> with that are heavily dependent upon a well designed and specified security
> model.  e.g., We have yet to address the security aspects of "distributed"
> registry/repository.  Security must be specified and worked sooner rather
> than later.
>
> In direct contrast, I believe that Ad Hoc query can easily be added later.
>
> Joel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:06 PM
> To: ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: Re: Priorities for Vancouver POC
>
> Farrukh,
>
> IMHO security (authetication or authorization) is a well understood aspect
> and will easily fall in place anytime.  Enriching the "registry"
> capabilities should be a priority. Hence I would vote for ad hoc query
> capability
>
> Thanks, Prasad
>
> Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>
> > In today's POC con call today I was asked to gather input from the
> > Registry team on our priorities for Registry functionality that should
> > be implemented and shown for Vancouver. The one guideline we must bear
> > in mind is that any functionality that we suggest for POC must be
> > speced.
> >
> > According to our phased delivery plan developed at Tokyo, we have the
> > following new functionality planned for our specs for Release 1
> > (Vancouver time frame):
> >
> > -Registry security (authentication and authorization)
> > -Ad hoc query capability
> >
> > Please share your sense of priorities for what Registry functionality
> > should be implemented and shown for the Vancouver POC. Please indicate
> > priority (1 being highre priority than 2).
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Farrukh

--
Regards,
Farrukh