[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: JSR-000093: JAXR - your opinions?
The reason why I asked these questions is that since last summer I have been talking about various aspects of standards creation. For example, we have 1) the creation of the spec 2) the creation of an API that is not language-specific 3) language-specific bindings 4) conformance tests 5) certification A natural question is how much of 2) - 5) should the creators in 1) produce. Many people believe that conformance tests should not be done by the people who did the spec because a neutral party might do a better job, although possibly with less inside knowledge of ambiguity resolution that is in the heads of the implementors. The W3C and OASIS have different opinions here, for example. ebXML will have to deal with 4) and 5) eventually. In the same way, language-specific bindings can be done by the spec implementors or by another organization. Perhaps the spec implementors can do a better job at the bindings, if they have the resources available. This also makes the general standards/binding development process more scalable than always doing in one organization associated with the language. Bob Sutor, IBM ebXML Vice-Chair
Powered by eList eXpress LLC