RE: Resubmission of Distributed Registry Approaches.ppt

["Welsh, David" <David.Welsh@nordstrom.com>]

Sorry to jump in but one slight correction to what you said Scott : "... you
described are Collaborations and SHOULD have a Specification Schema."
technically really should be "... you described are Collaborations and COULD
have a Specification Schema."
BP is based on UMM, not Spec Schema. 
Thanks
Dave


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Hinkelman [mailto:srh@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:46 PM
> To: David RR Webber
> Cc: Martin W Sachs; Nieman, Scott; 
> 'ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org '; Lisa
> Carnahan
> Subject: Re: Resubmission of Distributed Registry Approaches.ppt
> 
> 
> David, perhaps missed my point.
> Taking the role of an ebXML BP purest,
> the interactions that you described are Collaborations and should
> have a Specification Schema. CPPs reference Roles in those 
> Specification
> Schemas.
> 
> Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer
> XML Industry Enablement
> IBM e-business Standards Strategy
> 512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
> srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074
> 
> 
> 
> David RR Webber <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>@compuserve.com> on 04/03/2001
> 04:25:26 PM
> 
> To:   Scott Hinkelman/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
> cc:   Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "Nieman, Scott"
>       <Scott.Nieman@NorstanConsulting.com>, 
> "'ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
>       '" <ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org>, Lisa Carnahan
>       <lisa.carnahan@nist.gov>
> Subject:  Re: Resubmission of Distributed Registry Approaches.ppt
> 
> 
> 
> Message text written by Scott Hinkelman
> >
> Good point Marty. In ebXML, there needs to be a Specification Schema
> defined to obtain that business information.
> 
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<
> 
> Scott,
> 
> I'm not sure on this - since we already have Classification.
> 
> Say I wanted all Plumbers then I use the Filtered Query on
> Classification only  to discover if the registry has any 
> classification
> containing 'Plumber'.  I may get back a set of responses showing
> NAICS, UNSPSC and DUNS as answers.
> 
> Another approach would be - since I'm only interested in Businesses
> as a a priori - I could pre-determine that classifications for NAICS,
> UNSPSC and DUNS exist, and query instead on those classifications
> being in the registry.
> 
> As I previously noted - knowing how many registry items reference
> that classification would then give an indication of volume of content
> too - to allow prioritization of subsequent search requests.
> 
> The alternative is to specify a business classification ourselves,
> but this seems to be a path we don't want to traverse.
> 
> DW.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-regrep-request@lists.ebxml.org
>