Subject: R of R - sellers, but no buyers??
Message text written by "Farrukh" >> Note that the registry of registries case is special since in that case it > is > likely that each registry would register its own explicit CPP in the > registry > of registries. < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Farrukh, Why is this likely? Since we can spec' that the CPP goes in an ebXML sub-directory off the URL of the registry site - then we remove the need for R of R as a required piece. Or this in the category of "shameless plug for my company's approach", which is totally OK - BTW - but just trying to unravel the knotted string here a little bit ; -) Scott H said this very succintly yesterday - "Non-replicated community-based ebXML Registries would likely reflect change more quickly, and not need to scale with volumes appropriate across all sectors. I also believe this two-tiered approach sets direction on path for any future ultimate integration". Thanks, DW.
eList eXpress LLC