Subject: RE: Meeting notes 05/09/2001
Meeting Notes for 05/09/2001 Attendance: Joe Dalman- TIE Commerce Sally Fuger- AIAG Byoung-Youl Song-ETRI Kunio Mizoglichi- ECOM Nikola Stojanovic- Encoda Jong L. Kim- InnoDigital Len Gallagher- NIST John Pietit- KPMG Julian Followell- Burns ECS Kathryn Breininger- Boeing Lisa Carnahan- NIST Kyu-Chul Lee- CNU Yutaka Yoshida- Sun Deuk Jin Jung- KIEC Farrukh Najmi(Phone)- Sun Vadim Draluk- BEA Scott Hinkelman- IBM Meeting started at 9:15 am Started by recapping work done on Tuesday with the open issues. Recapped steering meeting which the comment being the split of the work groups. What the executive committee had decided on Tuesday night was to have CC, BP goes to UN/CEFACT and RR, TRP, CPA, CPP goes to OASIS. There was some discussion that CC and BP crossed both organizations. TA and Marketing will be run by both organizations. The following groups will not exist after Vienna Requirements, POC, and QRT. Next Scott Hinkelman from IBM proposed that the UDDI ebXML be submitted as a whitepaper from the ebXML regrep group. The group agreed to bring it to the steering committee as a whitepaper with removing the company logos and replace with ebXML logo. Yutaka discussed the options of how we can move the ebXML regrep group into OASIS. The two options seem to be either join the current OASIS regrep group or disband the OASIS group and create a new one. The regrep group passed a motion to approve the ebXML-UDDI document as an example of a realization of registry of registries with leveraging UDDI. 10:00 am to 10:15 am Break 10:15 am Group reviewed the changes made by Nikola for the example GetContentResponse Message Structure in Section 8.5.2. The changes were made to reflect the current work in TRP that uses Soap. The group agreed that it look good and make the changes Len lead a discussion on how he used the ebXMLerror schema definition and changed it to a DTD called RegistryErrorList. The group agreed with the changes to the DTD and then removed appendix A.1 which had the ebXMLerror schema from the TRP specification. The other element that we looked at was RegistryResponse and how all other responses could use it to return success or failure. The group next spent some time looking at the wording around CPA and CPP and what we could say for now. We changed some of the words to give the current status around CPP and CPA. 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm lunch 1:00 pm Group updated changes log and replaced figures that updates
Powered by
eList eXpress LLC