Re: To the QA team

[Dick Raman <Dick.Raman@cab-edi.net>]

Hi All,

I indeed think Rik needs to explain what exactly he feels the QR team needs
to do with regard to the review process...In San Jose it was agreed that the
QR team would give an opinion on all deliverables, before they went to
public review.  The QR team does not look at (or edit) details...only checks
if the Deliverable is consistent with requirements and the direction all
teams are moving into. The whole review process is a Steering Group
activity, where on previous occasions the STC has altered schedules and the
like...When appropriate the QR team will give input here, but the STC should
decide.
So what is missing here Rik?

Dick

----- Original Message -----
From: <ebxml-stc-errors@lists.ebxml.org>
To: <rawlins@metronet.com>; Ebxml-Stc <ebxml-stc@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 8:20 PM
Subject: RE: To the QA team


> same process, but some one needs to make the process the same across all
> teams... rik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Rawlins [mailto:rawlins@metronet.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 11:33 AM
> To: Ebxml-Stc
> Subject: Re: To the QA team
>
>
> Rik,
>
> Would you please clarify?  You say on the one hand that the team editor
> function
> should be in charge of the comment process, but yet you say that the qa
team
> should be responsible for and run the process across all teams.   Are you
> referring to the same or different processes?
>
> Mike
>
> richard drummond wrote:
>
> > Bob and Dick, as my team edits the documents, i seems to me it will be
> > necessary that we extend our editing processes some what. the trp team
has
> > changed the comments forms and put a new column in which tell what kind
of
> > comment it is... such as technical, typo.... and such. also we need to
> make
> > the team editor function clearly the one in charge of the comment
process.
> > we have discussed this before. i think the qa team should be responsible
> for
> > this process across all teams. we, the stc, will have to put the process
> in
> > place and have qa run it. what do you think?  best regards, rik
>
> --
> Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EDI Consulting
> http://www.metronet.com/~rawlins/
>
>
>
>